Letter to US Department of Justice

US Department of Justice, Senators and Supreme Court Justice

America And Freemasonry: 2025

Evans Nicholson, www.ctmin.org

My son Dennis was born in Bellingham, Washington, on December 24, 1980. Within a few short years, he began showing symptoms of abuse. Shortly after this, my ex-wife was diagnosed with issues involving episodes of rage. Court proceedings began in the Whatcom County Superior Court in Bellingham in 1983, with further court appearances over the next two and a half years. During this period, numerous medical reports were provided to the courts, Child Protection Services, and various government agencies seeking intervention for a child in acute distress. One of the reports in my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II, Attachment ‘A’, identifies people with my ex-wife’s condition as having “… in a fit of rage, killed or almost killed people very close to them and been placed in mentally ill offender programs as being not guilty by reason of insanity.” In the medical reports, Attachment ‘A’, Dennis was diagnosed as an “at-risk child,” suffering from “moderate mental illness,” in need of immediate intervention due to abuse and a “risk to his life.” Despite all the medical evidence, no intervention from any of the agencies mentioned took place.

During these two and a half years, Dennis was subjected to life-altering abuse through the courts, while Washington State agencies refused to intervene, allowing this abuse to continue. While this may seem highly improbable and difficult to believe, I will be providing evidence to prove how this same source of criminality continues to be a threat to children and others across America every day.

In sending this letter to U.S. officials, I’ve also sent a parallel letter to every Member of Parliament, Senator, and Supreme Court Justice in Canada. Although the content of these two letters, shared with the public, are different, they depend on each other for a more complete overview of how Masonic activity affects each of us. For those who may not know what Freemasonry is or its presence throughout every level of government, our courts, and society, it would be helpful to begin with the background information contained in North America And Freemasonry, sent to Canadian officials. As part of that overview, Freemasonry On Trial was recommended as a resource intended to also be helpful for Masons, most of whom don’t understand what they have become involved in.

Whether in Britain, Europe, or elsewhere, America is one of many nations compromised by Masonic activity. Although this infiltration began before the founding of America, most people may not be aware of its existence or how much Freemasonry has and continues to manipulate almost every facet of American society. It does this by maintaining various levels of secrecy, especially within the majority of its members in the lower degrees, giving it the ability to violate U.S. law, including the U.S. Constitution. To understand how it has accomplished this, historical perspectives are provided in North America And Freemasonry. Again, as suggested, it would be helpful to view these perspectives first to understand how Masonic activity can function within society without restraint or accountability, affecting each of us—whether in our cost of living, healthcare, and even in our basic freedoms.

To confirm criminality, I will focus on how various Washington State authorities responded to my son by their refusal to intervene in child abuse in submission to Masonic authority, rather than to the law they had sworn to uphold. Unfortunately, this Masonic authority would also impact federal agencies to disregard child abuse when Masonic obligations are involved.

The evidence being provided is listed as Attachment ‘A’ through Attachment ‘F’ in my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II, October 1, 2007. This letter to Queen Elizabeth II was sent during a time of difficulty involving threats from those within the Canadian government affiliated with Freemasonry. In February 2008, I received a reply from Buckingham Palace, informing me that various points raised in my letter had been sent to the relevant government department by request of Her Majesty. Following this intervention, there were no further threats from government sources. Through this intervention, I was also cleared to run in the 2008 Canadian Federal Election. I ran as an Independent on an anti-corruption platform to attach Freemasonry to the Criminal Code of Canada, following the precedent established by British Parliament in the 1990s. Now, sixteen years later, I’ve been prompted to share why I applied to run in that 2008 election, which is explained in North America And Freemasonry.

All the medical reports are found in Attachment ‘A’. Without a response to these reports, the voice recordings in Attachment ‘F’, identified as Tape #4, were made between February 18 to June 1, 1985. They were made out of desperation for a child in acute distress. I believed these voice recordings would provide indisputable proof that no U.S. agency, court, or otherwise could deny or refuse to respond to. I was wrong. I didn’t understand how Masonic obligations, sworn in various Masonic rituals, would override even the welfare of children in America.

As noted on page 3 of my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II, before all of this, my ex-wife had told me the case had already been decided between a Masonic judge and her relatives affiliated with this judge. Shortly after telling me this, I became a Freemason in Canada, attempting to neutralize any potential threat this might have towards my son’s safety.

Having become a Freemason, I felt it was important to find out if there was any merit or cause for concern from the Masonic sources my ex-wife had identified. To do this, I visited two American lodges during their open house community outreach events without sharing my concerns. As expected, Judge Swedberg was highly endorsed, which briefly gave me a sense of relief until my host continued. I was told how he had been placed in the courts to rule on behalf of his Masonic brethren. Visiting the Bellingham Lodge, my host shared even further. He told me how Masonic brethren recommended in every county throughout the state would be appointed by the Governor. Initially, while I didn’t believe these and other claims, I was disturbed as to why these fellow Masons would brag about criminal activity, including property matters with judgments awarded to Masonic brethren. Shortly after, this court began for the next two and a half years in which my son and I experienced this criminality.

While still a Mason, it took time to understand the depth to which Freemasonry can subvert justice through its Masonic obligations. Some of these obligations are found in The Court System And Freemasonry, pages 25-29, Appendix B, Sworn to Persecute. After coming to terms that Freemasonry in the higher levels (called degrees) tolerates even child abuse, it was easier to recognize elements of criminality that allow these things to occur under its authority. Although I knew Judge Swedberg was a Mason, I had recently learned he was a high-ranking Mason ruling on behalf of my ex-wife through her relatives in the Lodge, even though I didn’t understand how this could impact the safety of children. We tend to believe there are laws to guarantee these things can’t happen.

On October 25, 1985, although the Department of Social and Health Services had been provided with all of the medical reports, including the voice recordings, they reported no abuse and closed the case: Attachment ‘D’. It was only after the voice recordings had been made available and ignored that I was finally able to accept the reality of the criminality involved.

The highest authority in the state for child protection and welfare had closed the case, finding no evidence of abuse. When high-ranking Masons are placed into the highest levels of authority, these are the kinds of things occurring across America, where even the lives of those under its authority don’t impact Masonic activity—something very few Masons in the lower degrees would be aware of. While the evidence had either been ignored or destroyed, I had complete copies of every report. The following quotes are taken from the medical reports in Attachment ‘A,’ beginning with the May 23, 1983 report from Dr. Watson, the court-appointed psychiatrist. Just three days later he gave his courtroom testimony on May 26, 1983.

Dr. Watson, May 26, 1983.

“If Barbara .., there is, I feel, a threat to this child and I have seen instances where children with parents like this have been in life-threatening situations.”

Dr. Black, March 19, 1984.

“Much more important than Dennis’ present diagnostic label is his future development. I consider his, on the basis of the above evidence, to be a child who is definitely at risk of developing a serious & lasting behaviour disorder.”

Dr. Bundt, May 7, 1984.

“Indeed some of these individuals have in a fit of rage, killed or almost killed people very close to them and been placed in mentally ill offender programs as not guilty by reason of insanity.”

Dr. Mitchell, April 27, 1984

“Dr. Watson diagnosed Barbara as having a personality disorder, being suicidal, having violet tendencies, as I understand it. He testified in the custody/access trial and according to the transcript that I have read, outlined his clinical impressions and conclusions about her mental condition. Ultimately, however, he recommended in favour of her retaining custody of Dennis and it appears that a large part of his argument focused on his belief that she might seriously harm herself if Dennis were not to remain with her.

I find this extremely peculiar. I have testified at all levels of court in B.C. and on many dozens of occasions in Family Relations Act, Divorce Act and Family and Child Service Act matters including issues of the mental health of parents and how those may impact on the safety and well-being of the child. The test in law here in B.C. is the best interests of the child. Without question I have not doubt that the best interests of a child of Dennis’ age at the time of the custody trial and now would be best served by having him in the principle care of a loving parent who demonstrates no mental dysfunction or emotional ill-health.”

Dr. Giles, June 24, 1985.

1. “That the child be removed from its present living environment where he is being cared for by his mother.”

2. “That the appropriate United States child-protection authorities be notified in order that a home-study report may be initiated.”

3. “That a psychological assessment of the mother be conducted in order to ascertain her present psychological and emotional status.”

4. “That a psychological assessment of the child be conducted in order to determine his present psychological and emotional status and more specifically to ascertain the extent and effects of his abuse.”

After this medical evidence, taken from Attachment ‘A’, had either been ignored or destroyed by Washington State authorities and possibly those federal agencies it had been sent to, I continued to gather the voice recordings in Attachment ‘F’.

As noted on page 5 of my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II, the prosecutor involved in filing illegal wiretapping charges declined to do so after listening to the voice recordings. He said, “I won’t find a jury in this state to convict him.” While I appreciated his response, it confirmed his possession of the voice recordings and his failure to respond promptly to a child in distress, whose life was at risk.

In North America, under penalty of law, every authority is required to intervene on behalf of those under duress. Ignoring child abuse is a serious federal offence, stating that, “Everyone is criminally negligent who, in omitting to do anything that is his duty to do so, shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons.” When the voice recordings were ignored or destroyed, I asked myself who had the authority to make this happen. At that point, I never thought the Governor himself was directly involved, although I knew it was possible. I did, however, believe that some assistant to the Office of the Governor was more likely to be a Mason affiliated with Judge Swedberg. Whatever the case may have been, I believe those complicit were black-hearted in their disregard for a child in distress and "at risk to his life." With high-ranking Masons, like Swedberg, driving this activity, I can only think of a very slim and specific minority that could direct Washington State authorities to engage in this level of criminality.

With the October 25, 1985, letter from the Department of Social and Health Services, two and a half years had passed under Swedberg’s Masonic authority. However, before this, given the ongoing threat toward my son, I had written to every level of the U.S. government seeking intervention. I had even written to the appropriate White House department, doing the things any American parent may have also done. Shortly after sending this correspondence, I was required to appear before Swedberg one final time. He was furious, aware of my letter to the Governor, and expressed how angry he had been after receiving it. At that point, I remembered what my Masonic host in the Bellingham Lodge had told me two and a half years previously. I then fully understood that there would be no intervention from any state agency, the Office of the Governor, or apparently any federal authority. This is the reality of Freemasonry in America, even when the lives of children are involved. However, as these things become public knowledge, it becomes more difficult for those under Masonic authority to conduct criminal activity in secret. When high-ranking Masons in positions of power are exposed to the public, their activities are greatly curtailed. Lower-degree Masons also become a restraining factor when they become aware of the threat to children and the public. Without the cover of secrecy, many lives and livelihoods will receive due process of law rather than court judgments awarded to Masonic brethren.

While it was difficult to believe there would be no relief for Dennis in the U.S., I had considered it and did some preparation in Canada. After an application, Canadian citizenship for Dennis was obtained. I had spoken with Child Find Canada, sending them the same medical reports and voice recordings I had sent to the Department of Social and Health Services. I was assured that if Dennis were to go missing from the U.S., they would not be looking for him. True to what I had been told, there would later be an incident with my ex-wife, from which Child Find Canada wrote the letter in Attachment ‘E.’ However, before this, on November 13, 1985, Dennis and I crossed over into Canada, as detailed on pages 6-7 of my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II. In response, a U.S. federal warrant was issued for my arrest. Two years later, I became a federal peace officer in Canada until my retirement in 2016. On occasion, when speaking, I’ve referred to this as God’s sense of humour, although in reality, His intervention was protecting my son’s life, as seen throughout my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II.

Even after Dennis was safely outside U.S. jurisdiction, Swedberg came to Canada on at least two occasions, attempting to recruit Masonic brethren to take action, as noted in pages 9-10 of my Letter: Queen Elizabeth II. Whether affiliated with the state Governor or other U.S. authorities, this is the cooperation high-ranking Masons expect and will normally receive. However, contrary to his U.S. position of influence, this was where Canadian Lodge members protected both Dennis and myself due to the safety of a child being involved. When I think of these things, I think of my grandparents involved in the Lodge, including other members of my church—good and decent people. In this same situation, if American Masons had been aware of a threat toward a child, they would have also stepped forward. When the majority of Masons have been purposely deceived, they remain unaware of criminal activity and unable to oppose it. The actual percentage of high-ranking Masons in the upper degrees with a disregard for human life is very small, possibly 3-5%. Unfortunately, because of their disregard for even children, they can function within places like Corporate America without those barriers impacting profitability. On pages 12-13 of my letter to Queen Elizabeth II, there is an expression of gratitude towards those who helped Dennis, including members of the Canadian Masonic Lodge. Relative to this, it is noted in various CTMin resources that 75% of all Masons never go beyond the first three Blue Lodge degrees. It’s important to keep this in mind, as everything above this level is intentionally hidden from these lower-degree Masons. Within the historical context provided in North America And Freemasonry, it’s shown how 90% of all Masons in America left once the true nature of Freemasonry—including murder—was made public. The inner secrets hidden from Blue Lodge Masons, including many of those in the Upper Degrees, are called a deadly deception binding members into supporting activities they would normally oppose. Within the various rituals and obligations, we bound ourselves under symbolic penalties of death, swearing never to question Masonic authority, “So help me god.” Some of these obligations are found in The Court System And Freemasonry, pages 19-24, Appendix A: Mandate for Blind Obedience.

In America, there are those like my son who are being abused by high-ranking Masons with assistance from other high-ranking Masons when called to do so. Without the freedom of the press to expose these things, Masons—especially higher-ranking Masons—can violate any law in America without convictions from their Masonic brethren placed in the courts to rule on their behalf. The historical reference to our loss of freedom of the press, making these things possible, is expanded upon in North America And Freemasonry.

Despite all its power in America, one major source of opposition remained: the Protestant Church stood as a firm witness against the Masonic corruption sweeping throughout North America. Masons bound under Masonic deception were being set free through this church witness. In response, Freemasonry began its attack on the Protestant Church in 1926, continuing for almost 100 years up to the present. Although this attack upon the Protestant Church is expanded upon in North America And Freemasonry, a brief summary provides insight into the means by which Freemasonry operates to insert its presence into every level of society. The following is taken from The Character, Claims, and Practical Workings of Freemasonry, written by Charles Finney in 1869. His book was reprinted in 1998 by John Daniel (www.scarletandthebeast.com) with the following Epilog:

Epilog: Freemasonry’s Retaliation Against the Church (1998) by John Daniel, pages 202-303:

This brings us to phase seven, the Masonic infiltration of American churches. In 1926, the Scottish Rite published an article in its January New Age Magazine, telling Masons to join Christian churches. It was an order coming directly from the Supreme Council of Charleston, South Carolina, the headquarters of Universal Freemasonry. Written by W.B. Zimmerman, the article entitled “Let There Be Light” stated that every Mason “should cast his lot with the Church – help vitalize it, liberate it, modernize it, and render it aggressive and efficient – to do less is treason to your country, to your Creator, and to the obligation you have promised to obey.” Each Mason was to follow these instructions as directed by his local lodge.

A Mason’s obligation is more powerful than any law of the land. Under oath, he obligates himself to carry out all orders given him by the Masonic hierarchy. Consequently, following the publication of this article in 1926, Masons throughout the United States flocked to join local Protestant churches. In time, these Masons worked their way into church leadership. And in time, they turned the evangelical churches materialistic and lukewarm.

As a result of the silence imposed by Masons in leadership positions, they began recruiting members from within the Church. These Christians began joining an organization dedicated to the destruction of their churches. Although appearing to have been overwhelmed by Luciferian forces, more than anything else, Freemasonry fears His Church once again exposing the evil deeds of darkness, setting captives free from bondage throughout America. Secrets Masons Don’t Know includes a brief explanation of Luciferian doctrines.

Occasionally, I’ve defined Freemasonry by the inner Luciferian doctrines hidden from most members, especially those in the lower degrees. On other occasions, I’ve defined Masonic criminality as the evil deeds of darkness. In one sense, in doing this, I apologize to all the good and decent members—those who will be initially affected by these definitions. As noted in North America And Freemasonry, “I continue to have a high regard for the majority of these good people within the Lodge, most of whom are seeking fellowship and the charitable opportunities offered through membership.” However, truth is required for freedom from bondage. If nothing else, for those members having difficulty coming to terms with the truth involving Freemasonry, I direct each of these members to the voice recordings in Attachment ‘F’. Although these recordings, in addition to the medical reports in Attachment ‘A’, were provided to the courts, Child Protective Services, and government agencies, Masonic authority prevented any intervention. If you are a parent or otherwise, apply this as a standard to define the deeds of darkness within Freemasonry where Luciferian doctrines have impacted every level of American society. When the lives of even children are not safe in U.S. courts presided over by Masonic judges, the U.S. Constitution has been grievously violated by way of blatant and ongoing criminality throughout America. Try to imagine if this were your child, or any other child in America, being abused under Masonic authority and how you would define Freemasonry.

Attachment ‘A’, medical documents

Attachment ‘F’, voice recordings

In closing,

God bless Israel.

God bless America in its support for Israel.

God bless all of those in their support for Israel.

Evans Nicholson.